Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
Date: 2007-07-13 21:10:59
Message-ID: 4697EA63.7080403@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Dave Page wrote:

Regardless of this whole thread about CMD, it's not cool for a
company selling PostgreSQL support to be slagging PostgreSQL.

Which was the point of the original post last night. No one from EDB can
legitimize that.

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Denis Lussier 2007-07-13 21:17:16 Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-07-13 21:09:30 Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease