| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease |
| Date: | 2007-07-13 21:07:22 |
| Message-ID: | 4697E98A.7070601@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Jim Nasby wrote:
> On Jul 13, 2007, at 3:24 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Jonah H. Harris wrote:
>>> On 7/13/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> That kind of makes my point :)
>>> The fact is, if you write a PostgreSQL-only app, it will run perfectly
>>> on PostgreSQL or EnterpriseDB.
>>
>> But that isn't what I asked. I asked if I wrote an EnterpriseDB app
>> would it run on PostgreSQL, the answer is clearly no. Yes, yes we can
>> of course not use Enterprise (Oracle) features, but one of the
>> benefits of EnterpriseDB is that I "can" use those Oracle features.
>>
>> That is my only point.
>
> And if someone buys Mammoth and sets up replication, they're just as
> locked-in.
Nope.
Joshua D. Drake
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-07-13 21:09:30 | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-07-13 21:06:14 | Re: Problem with recent PostgreSQL relatedpressrelease |