Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark

From: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark
Date: 2007-07-11 18:34:13
Message-ID: 469522A5.1070409@sun.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Can you list others that seemed out of place?

Thanks.
Regards,
Jignesh


Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jignesh K. Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>   
>> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>     
>>> May I ask you why you set max_prepared_transactions to 450, while 
>>> you're apparently not using prepared transactions, according to this 
>>> quote:
>>>       
>
>   
>> Yep.. one of the things that we didn't revert back and got strayed out 
>> there.
>>     
>
> There were quite a few settings in that list that looked like random
> experimentation rather than recommendable good practice to me.
>
> 			regards, tom lane
>   

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Greg SmithDate: 2007-07-11 18:35:50
Subject: Re: best use of an EMC SAN
Previous:From: Andrew SullivanDate: 2007-07-11 18:27:01
Subject: Re: best use of an EMC SAN

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group