Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
Cc: Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3
Date: 2007-06-25 09:48:07
Message-ID: 467F8F57.6040000@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Greg Smith wrote:
> LDC certainly makes things better in almost every case. My "allegiance"
> comes from having seen a class of transactions where LDC made things
> worse on a fast/overloaded system, in that it made some types of service
> guarantees harder to meet, and I just don't know who else might run into
> problems in that area.

Please describe the class of transactions and the service guarantees so
that we can reproduce that, and figure out what's the best solution.

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-06-25 10:06:37 Re: msvc and vista fun
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2007-06-25 09:15:07 Re: Load Distributed Checkpoints, take 3