Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD <Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)s-itsolutions(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Winner of naming discussions: Synchronous Commit
Date: 2007-06-25 08:30:38
Message-ID: 467F7D2E.3070707@postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> So, although its a knife edge decision, I'd say go with
> synchronous_commit = off. 

I agree - I'm not entirely sure why but it just feels more natural than 
asynchronous_commit = on. Plus the reasons you give seem valid.

Regards, Dave


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2007-06-25 08:43:53
Subject: Re: msvc and vista fun
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-06-25 08:20:59
Subject: Re: msvc and vista fun

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group