Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hardware suggestions

From: Scott Marlowe <smarlowe(at)g2switchworks(dot)com>
To: Francisco Reyes <lists(at)stringsutils(dot)com>
Cc: christian(dot)braun(at)tudor(dot)lu, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hardware suggestions
Date: 2007-06-21 22:29:15
Message-ID: 467AFBBB.3040204@g2switchworks.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Francisco Reyes wrote:
> Scott Marlowe writes:
>
>> and a bit more resiliant to drive failure, RAID-5 can give you a lot 
>> of storage and very good read performance, so it works well for 
>> reporting / 
>
> New controllers now also have Raid 6, which from the few reports I 
> have seen seems to have a good compromise of performance and space.
>

Very true.  And if they've gone to the trouble of implementing RAID-6, 
they're usually at least halfway decent controllers.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: DimitriDate: 2007-06-21 22:38:40
Subject: Re: Data transfer very slow when connected via DSL
Previous:From: Rainer BauerDate: 2007-06-21 22:09:17
Subject: Re: Data transfer very slow when connected via DSL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group