Sorry for the late reply.
Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 17:13 +0100, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>> I've just completed the patch for only listing tables accessible by the
>> current user for psqlodbc as detailed in my email here:
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-odbc/2007-05/msg00068.php. As
>> suggested in the original post, I have implemented a tick box called
>> "Only list user-accessible tables" on page 2 of the Datasource Advanced
>> Options dialog.
Recently added boolean options are defined as some bits in Extra Opts.
Is it OK to define the option as a bit in Extra Opts ?
>> When this box is ticked, only tables on which the user
>> has one of SELECT, INSERT, DELETE or UPDATE privileges will appear in
>> the table list for the given DSN.
Isn't it sufficient to chack SELECT privilege only ?
>> I think that this would be a really useful feature to add to the
>> psqlodbc driver, and so I have attached a diff from CVS HEAD. As far as
>> I know, the only part I have missed is adding the tickbox and its
>> corresponding translation to the Japanese version of the dialog in
>> psqlodbc.rc. Please let me know if there is any more work I need to do
>> in order to get this applied.
In response to
pgsql-odbc by date
|Next:||From: Phillip Kilgore||Date: 2007-06-21 22:01:21|
|Subject: ODBC call syntax returns 1 column instead of n columns|
|Previous:||From: Thomas Mueller||Date: 2007-06-20 13:10:03|
|Subject: Using the PostgreSQL ODBC driver for another database|