| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now? |
| Date: | 2007-06-04 15:30:58 |
| Message-ID: | 46643032.7050009@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:30:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> AFAICS, Peter's recent incomplete updating of error message wording
>> should have broken every last man jack of 'em. And yet there's still
>> some green to be seen. I think we are looking at problems in the ecpg
>> test scaffolding. For instance, dragonfly claims a green build, but
>> http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_stage_log.pl?nm=dragonfly&dt=2007-06-04%20043001&stg=ecpg-check
>> shows this interesting trace:
>> ...
>> testing connect/test2.pgc ... ./pg_regress: bad substitution
>>
>
> Is it possible to find out which line is reporting this error? Looks to
> me like some incompatibility on the shell side.
>
turnip_moth is also a Solaris 9 box and doesn't seem have the same issue.
Kris, is there anything unusual installed on the box that would make it
behave like this?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Wilhansen Li | 2007-06-04 15:52:24 | libpq and Binary Data Formats |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2007-06-04 15:18:53 | Re: Running all tests by default |