Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Subject: Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?
Date: 2007-06-04 15:30:58
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 03:30:07AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> AFAICS, Peter's recent incomplete updating of error message wording
>> should have broken every last man jack of 'em.  And yet there's still
>> some green to be seen.  I think we are looking at problems in the ecpg
>> test scaffolding.  For instance, dragonfly claims a green build, but
>> shows this interesting trace:
>> ...
>> testing connect/test2.pgc                      ... ./pg_regress: bad substitution
> Is it possible to find out which line is reporting this error? Looks to
> me like some incompatibility on the shell side.

turnip_moth is also a Solaris 9 box and doesn't seem have the same issue.

Kris, is there anything unusual installed on the box that would make it 
behave like this?



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Wilhansen LiDate: 2007-06-04 15:52:24
Subject: libpq and Binary Data Formats
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2007-06-04 15:18:53
Subject: Re: Running all tests by default

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group