Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: So, why isn't *every* buildfarm member failing ecpg right now?
Date: 2007-06-04 13:41:44
Message-ID: 46641698.3070403@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> AFAICS, Peter's recent incomplete updating of error message wording
> should have broken every last man jack of 'em.  And yet there's still
> some green to be seen.  I think we are looking at problems in the ecpg
> test scaffolding. 

Yes. The buildfarm script uses the same logic as other tests:

	my $ecpg_dir = "$pgsql/src/interfaces/ecpg";
	my @makeout = `cd  $ecpg_dir && $make NO_LOCALE=1 check 2>&1`;
	my $status = $? >>8;


The sooner we move to a more unified testing infrastructure the better.

cheers

andrew



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-06-04 14:31:26
Subject: Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-06-04 13:39:17
Subject: Re: Command tags in create/drop scripts

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group