Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Does anyone actually read these?
>> LOG:  database system was shut down at 2007-05-30 17:54:39 CEST
>> LOG:  checkpoint record is at 0/42C4FC
>> LOG:  redo record is at 0/42C4FC; undo record is at 0/0; shutdown TRUE
>> LOG:  next transaction ID: 0/593; next OID: 10820
>> LOG:  next MultiXactId: 1; next MultiXactOffset: 0
>> LOG:  database system is ready
> 
>> Why not just:
> 
>> LOG:  database system is ready
> 
> I like the report of the previous system state (the first line).
> I agree that the four in the middle could be reduced to DEBUG1 or
> some such.

+1 from me. In case of recovery, I think one should still get the full 
output, no? It might be important information then.

Best Regards
Michael Paesold

In response to

• Re: Postmaster startup messages at 2007-05-30 17:16:58 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Postmaster startup messages at 2007-06-02 00:08:26 from Jim Nasby
• Re: Postmaster startup messages at 2007-06-02 20:10:44 from Peter Eisentraut

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-06-01 08:06:17
	Subject: Re: Postmaster startup messages
Previous:	From: ITAGAKI Takahiro	Date: 2007-06-01 05:07:29
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] like/ilike improvements