| From: | Michael Paesold <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postmaster startup messages |
| Date: | 2007-06-01 06:58:00 |
| Message-ID: | 465FC378.1030308@gmx.at |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Does anyone actually read these?
>> LOG: database system was shut down at 2007-05-30 17:54:39 CEST
>> LOG: checkpoint record is at 0/42C4FC
>> LOG: redo record is at 0/42C4FC; undo record is at 0/0; shutdown TRUE
>> LOG: next transaction ID: 0/593; next OID: 10820
>> LOG: next MultiXactId: 1; next MultiXactOffset: 0
>> LOG: database system is ready
>
>> Why not just:
>
>> LOG: database system is ready
>
> I like the report of the previous system state (the first line).
> I agree that the four in the middle could be reduced to DEBUG1 or
> some such.
+1 from me. In case of recovery, I think one should still get the full
output, no? It might be important information then.
Best Regards
Michael Paesold
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2007-06-01 08:06:17 | Re: Postmaster startup messages |
| Previous Message | ITAGAKI Takahiro | 2007-06-01 05:07:29 | Re: [HACKERS] like/ilike improvements |