Re: Uhm, so, yeah, speaking of /.

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Ribe <scott_ribe(at)killerbytes(dot)com>, PostgreSQL general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Uhm, so, yeah, speaking of /.
Date: 2007-05-30 18:41:00
Message-ID: 465DC53C.8050904@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jeff Davis wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 12:18 -0600, Scott Ribe wrote:
>>> I thought it had to do with letting a form sit around too long and
>>> then /. timing out the state.
>>>
>>> That's probably not good anyway: it should at least give you a real
>>> error message. However, they might not consider that a bug.
>> I didn't let the form sit around at all--didn't think to mention that
>> before. It may well not be related to MySQL at all, the point is simply that
>> although /. is well-known, gets a lot of hits, and works well enough for its
>> intended purpose, it is buggy and is NOT an example of what would be
>> acceptable reliability for most "mission critical" applications.
>>
>
> I was agreeing with you.
>
> I think that's what the "invalid form key" error is supposed to mean,
> but it probably happens for all kinds of other cases, too (which is bad
> and causes confusion).
>
> I agree that /. not a great example of stability or correctness.

Interesting statement. Question: What would be a great example of
stability of correctness?

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2007-05-30 18:47:39 Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored?
Previous Message novnov 2007-05-30 18:40:15 Re: function retuning refcursor, order by ignored?