Re: Concurrent psql patch

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>
>> If we're going to include libpq-int.h maybe we need to put it in
>> common.h. Is there a reason that our own client programs shouldn't use
>> our own library internals?
>>
>
> Seems like a really bad idea to me. I know I've cursed mysql more than
> once for doing the equivalent. Also, if psql needs more than is
> currently exported as official API, why wouldn't other programs need it
> too? If there's more needed here, let's see an official API change,
> not a hack.
>
>
>

Well, I guess the obvious API would be something like:

PGAsyncStatusType PQasyncStatus(const PGconn *conn);

cheers

andrew