Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view)

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>,Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>,pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating an updatable view)
Date: 2007-05-22 15:17:18
Message-ID: 4653097E.4050006@archonet.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> 
> Is there consensus what the correct behaviour should be for
> self-referential updates in read-committed mode? Does the SQL Spec
> have anything to say about this?

This seems to have gone all quiet. Do we need a TODO to keep a note of 
it? Just "correct behaviour for self-referential updates"

Hiroshi originally noted the problem in one of his views here:
   http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-05/msg00507.php

-- 
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-05-22 15:36:34
Subject: Re: CREATE TABLE LIKE INCLUDING INDEXES support
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-05-22 15:12:26
Subject: Re: Inconsistant SQL results - Suspected error with query planing or query optimisation.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group