Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: valgog <valgog(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance
Date: 2007-05-22 09:21:43
Message-ID: 4652B627.1070109@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

valgog wrote:
> I found several post about INSERT/UPDATE performance in this group,
> but actually it was not really what I am searching an answer for...
>
> I have a simple reference table WORD_COUNTS that contains the count of
> words that appear in a word array storage in another table.

I think this is the root of your problem, I'm afraid. You're trying to
count individual words when you're storing an array of words. I don't
think any of the Gist/GIN indexes will help you with this either.

However, since "you don't want to start from here" isn't very useful
here and now:

1. See what the performance (explain analyse) of the "select
distinct...generate_series()" statement is. I think you're right and
it's going to be slow.
2. You're looping through each row of word_storage and counting
separately. Write it as one query if possible.
3. As Peter says, don't insert then update, start with an empty table
and just insert totals for the lot (see #2).

I'd probably write the query in plperl/python or something else that
supports hash/dictionary structures. Then just process the whole
word_storage into the hash - assuming you only have a few thousand
distinct words that shouldn't take up too much memory.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joost Kraaijeveld 2007-05-22 09:29:46 is file size relevant in choosing index or table scan?
Previous Message Peter Childs 2007-05-22 09:05:27 Re: Key/Value reference table generation: INSERT/UPDATE performance