Re: UTF8MatchText

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dennis Bjorklund <db(at)zigo(dot)dhs(dot)org>, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: UTF8MatchText
Date: 2007-05-20 22:11:13
Message-ID: 4650C781.8050400@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> On the strength of this analysis, shouldn't we drop the separate
> UTF8 match function and just use SB_MatchText for UTF8?
>

We still call NextChar() after "_", and I think we probably need to,
don't we? If so we can't just marry the cases.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-05-20 22:23:50 Re: UTF8MatchText
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-05-20 22:02:10 Re: UTF8MatchText

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-05-20 22:23:50 Re: UTF8MatchText
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-05-20 22:02:10 Re: UTF8MatchText