Re: 8.3 pending patch queue

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> If people want proof that we have had some patches for months, this
> email is from Simon from January, 2007.
>

I don't think anyone (at least sanely) questions that there are patches
hanging out there.

Joshua D. Drake

> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:04 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>
>>> I will start processing the patches held for 8.3 this week or next, now
>>> that the holiday break is over:
>>>
>>> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches_hold
>>>
>> The following patches don't appear on this list:
>>
>> Concurrent psql
>> Original submission
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00249.php
>> Latest
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-12/msg00527.php
>> Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/concurrent/index.html
>>
>> WAL Index Split
>> Original submission
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-12/msg00045.php
>> Latest
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-01/msg00000.php
>>
>> Grouped Items
>> Latest
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-11/msg00051.php
>> Described here: http://community.enterprisedb.com/git/index.html
>>
>> Maintain Cluster Order
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-08/msg00124.php
>>
>> All have been awaiting review for at least a month (though in one case
>> the latest version is quite recent). They probably ought to be on the
>> hold queue; all are ready to be reviewed for final
>> application/rejection.
>>
>> I'd hasten to add that none of those are mine. My patches have received
>> good attention, so I'm not complaining just completing admin.
>>
>> --
>> Simon Riggs
>> EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>