Re: Event Spam..???

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> limiting listed courses to states where companies are registered as
>>> corporations... Such information is freely available, and it could be
>>> required that companies provide a link to their articles of
>>> incorporation in the states where they provide training - easy to check
>>> without undue work on those that filter events...
>>
>> Limiting the number of listings is not in our interests - we want to
>
> It is, if the listings are not legitimate.

Well, yes - I think that's a given.

>> show how much PostgreSQL is being used. Perhaps more importantly, how
>> *widely*. We'd want to list courses running in every state, even if they
>> were all the same company.
>>
>> Charging would almost certainly cause us problems given our financial
>> status. I suspect we could 'solicit donations', but that would obviously
>> not have the desired effect.
>
> No it wouldn't because the larger the donation the higher up the page
> the person would expect to be.

Listings move up the page in chronological order so that the closest
events are at the top. Ordering the page based on the donation given
would make it horrendous to use for the people that actually might want
training.

>> Limiting to the states in which companies are registered is a nonsense
>> as well - what about a company in Japan? How do we check them? Or what
>> about EnterpriseDB UK Ltd for example who cover the whole EMEA region -
>> would they (== we in case you didn't realise I work for them) be
>> restricted to listing courses in England because that's where we're
>> registered?
>>
>
> Perhaps a requirement that a link to the actual registration page for
> the class? Listing the details of where the class is etc...

I thought those were a given as well, but it doesn't hurt to be reminded.

Regards, Dave