Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock object

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Dorochevsky, Michel" <michel(dot)dorochevsky(at)softcon(dot)de>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock object
Date: 2007-04-27 08:44:16
Message-ID: 4631B7E0.4030407@enterprisedb.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Attached is the complete patch against HEAD to prevent hashtable bucket
> splits during hash_seq_search.  Any comments before I start
> back-porting?  I suppose we had better patch this all the way back,
> even though AtPrepare_Locks() is the only known trouble spot.

Looks good to me.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: rancpine cuiDate: 2007-04-27 08:53:01
Subject: How does the partitioned lock manager works?
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-04-27 08:05:38
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Reviewers Guide to DeferredTransactions/TransactionGuarantee

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-27 16:22:24
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #3244: problem with PREPARE
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2007-04-27 08:31:06
Subject: Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared lock object

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-27 14:02:25
Subject: Re: Hash function for numeric (WIP)
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-27 08:09:38
Subject: Re: Hash function for numeric (WIP)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group