Re: Simple query, 10 million records...MySQL ten times faster

From: Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)propertykey(dot)com>
To: zardozrocks <zardozrocks(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simple query, 10 million records...MySQL ten times faster
Date: 2007-04-26 21:40:17
Message-ID: 46311C41.4000906@propertykey.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

zardozrocks wrote:
> I have this table:
>
> CREATE TABLE test_zip_assoc (
> id serial NOT NULL,
> f_id integer DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
> lat_radians numeric(6,5) DEFAULT 0.00000 NOT NULL,
> long_radians numeric(6,5) DEFAULT 0.00000 NOT NULL
> );
> CREATE INDEX lat_radians ON test_zip_assoc USING btree (lat_radians);
> CREATE INDEX long_radians ON test_zip_assoc USING btree
> (long_radians);

Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't it be easier to just use
PostGIS? Or failing that, using the vanilla built-in point type and an
r-tree index? That's what r-tree indexes are made for.

--
Jeff Hoffmann
Head Plate Spinner
PropertyKey.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Staubo 2007-04-26 22:34:36 Re: index structure for 114-dimension vector
Previous Message Luke Lonergan 2007-04-26 21:39:56 Re: Simple query, 10 million records...MySQL ten times faster