| From: | Lewis Cunningham <lewisc(at)rocketmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Erik Jones <erik(at)myemma(dot)com>, Lewis Cunningham <lewisc(at)rocketmail(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)argudo(dot)org>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Certification |
| Date: | 2008-02-04 20:46:34 |
| Message-ID: | 463092.1914.qm@web35605.mail.mud.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-general |
--- Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> pgsql-hackers
> pgsql-users
>
> There really aren't any other groups of people. "people who want to
> talk about
There are hackers (contribute to PostgreSQL), DBAs (administer the
database), Developers (write application to interact with the
database) and users (use a tool like pgAdmin to query the database)?
When talking about coders, there are pl/pgSQL, PL/xxx, SQL, external
langauges. I think there are many groups.
If a person is interested in all the groups, is it hard to subscribe?
No.
If all groups are in one, is it hard to filter out? Yes.
LewisC
Lewis R Cunningham
An Expert's Guide to Oracle Technology
http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/oracle/guide/
LewisC's Random Thoughts
http://lewiscsrandomthoughts.blogspot.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Collin Kidder | 2008-02-04 20:58:28 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL Certification |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2008-02-04 20:23:47 | Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Certification |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Collin Kidder | 2008-02-04 20:58:28 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] PostgreSQL Certification |
| Previous Message | Jerry LeVan | 2008-02-04 20:42:49 | Re: Universal libpq.a ? |