Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psqlODBC 08.02.0300 doesn't compile

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Saito <z-saito(at)guitar(dot)ocn(dot)ne(dot)jp>, pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: psqlODBC 08.02.0300 doesn't compile
Date: 2007-04-25 15:47:07
Message-ID: 462F77FB.30206@postgresql.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> This makes life difficult for packagers who need to re-run aclocal
>>> (in my case, because Red Hat ships a different automake version than
>>> you guys are using).  I believe it's also a violation of the LGPL.
> 
>> Hmm, thats how Peter designed it for us so we didn't have to have our
>> own copies of all the PG macros iirc. I don't have enough autoconf foo
>> to know how best to fix it though. Peter?
> 
> Hm, so you're pulling those macros directly from the underlying Postgres
> installation?  I didn't think they got installed anywhere --- I could do
> the same if they are, but not if running aclocal requires access to a
> Postgres source tree.

No, it's built in a pre-configured source tree under src/interfaces. See
http://cvs.pgfoundry.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/psqlodbc/psqlodbc/docs/unix-compilation.html?rev=1.4
- the 'Building a distribution' section is the set of instructions that
Peter wrote.

Regards, Dave.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-25 16:20:07
Subject: Re: psqlODBC 08.02.0300 doesn't compile
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-25 15:41:40
Subject: Re: psqlODBC 08.02.0300 doesn't compile

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group