Gregory Stark wrote:
> So in short I think with your patch this piece of code no longer has a role.
> Either your patch kicks in and we never even look at the damaged page at all,
> or we should be treating it as corrupt data and just check zero_damaged_pages
> alone and not do anything special in recovery.
Good point. Adjusted patch attached. I added some comments as well.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-04-25 15:16:20|
|Subject: Re: Avoiding unnecessary reads in recovery|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2007-04-25 15:02:49|
|Subject: Re: ECPG failure on BF member Vaquita (Windows Vista)|