Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml
Date: 2007-04-24 21:09:47
Message-ID: 462E721B.6090202@lelarge.info
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Neil Conway a écrit :
> BTW, context diffs (diff -c) are preferred. For SGML patches, unified
> diffs (diff -u) are okay as well.
>
> On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 16:10 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> This patch adds a sentence on monitoring.sgml explaining that
>> stats_row_level needs to be enabled if user wants to get last
>> vacuum/analyze execution time.
>
> Why is this so? It sounds more like a bug than a feature to me.
>

I don't know why it works this way. Perhaps it wasn't the developer's
intention but, anyway, actually, it works like that.

--
Guillaume.
<!-- http://abs.traduc.org/
http://lfs.traduc.org/
http://docs.postgresqlfr.org/ -->

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-04-24 21:38:59 row-level stats and last analyze time
Previous Message Neil Conway 2007-04-24 18:57:28 Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2007-04-24 21:38:59 row-level stats and last analyze time
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-04-24 20:25:40 Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k o b j ect