Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml
Date: 2007-04-24 21:09:47
Message-ID: 462E721B.6090202@lelarge.info (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Neil Conway a écrit :
> BTW, context diffs (diff -c) are preferred. For SGML patches, unified
> diffs (diff -u) are okay as well.
> 
> On Sun, 2007-04-22 at 16:10 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
>> This patch adds a sentence on monitoring.sgml explaining that 
>> stats_row_level needs to be enabled if user wants to get last 
>> vacuum/analyze execution time.
> 
> Why is this so? It sounds more like a bug than a feature to me.
> 

I don't know why it works this way. Perhaps it wasn't the developer's 
intention but, anyway, actually, it works like that.


-- 
Guillaume.
<!-- http://abs.traduc.org/
      http://lfs.traduc.org/
      http://docs.postgresqlfr.org/ -->

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-04-24 21:38:59
Subject: row-level stats and last analyze time
Previous:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-04-24 18:57:28
Subject: Re: Patch for monitoring.sgml

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-04-24 21:38:59
Subject: row-level stats and last analyze time
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-24 20:25:40
Subject: Re: BUG #3245: PANIC: failed to re-find shared loc k o b j ect

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group