Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Wild idea: 9.0?

From: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Wild idea: 9.0?
Date: 2007-04-23 21:53:08
Message-ID: 462D2AC4.4070109@pooteeweet.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Hackers,
> 
> I was thinking about the upcoming release on my 32-hour epic airplane ordeal, 
> and realizing that it changes PostgreSQL in a lot of ways.  Between major 
> improvements to performance, major changes to the file format, and changes to 
> implicit conversions breaking backwards compatibility, our new ability to 
> more-or-less stick to deadlines ...
> 
> ... should this be 9.0 instead of 8.3?  


Just wondering: does this have any implications about a possible end of 
life of the 7.x branch?

regards,
Lukas

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-23 21:57:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-23 21:53:02
Subject: Re: Better error message for select_common_type()

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-23 21:57:37
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
Previous:From: Robert BernierDate: 2007-04-23 20:22:34
Subject: Re: Wild idea: 9.0?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group