Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] parser dilemma

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] parser dilemma
Date: 2007-04-22 16:28:38
Message-ID: 462B8D36.4060108@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> So I think attaching a precedence to the GENERATED keyword is dangerous.
>
>   

Especially when we have a good workaround which would just require use 
of ()  around certain postfix-operator expressions.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-22 16:54:29
Subject: Re: [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to InstallCheck failure]
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2007-04-22 15:39:28
Subject: Re: [Fwd: PGBuildfarm member narwhal Branch HEAD Status changed from OK to InstallCheck failure]

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-04-22 16:53:14
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Some further performance tweaks for planning large inheritance
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-04-22 13:29:20
Subject: Re: xpath_array with namespaces support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group