Re: SCSI vs SATA

From: Geoffrey <esoteric(at)3times25(dot)net>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: SCSI vs SATA
Date: 2007-04-06 12:43:36
Message-ID: 46164078.1080409@3times25.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> It seems hard to believe that the vendors themselves wouldn't burn in
>>> the drives for half a day, if that's all it takes to eliminate a large
>>> fraction of infant mortality.
>
>> I've read that much of the damage that causes hard drive infant mortality
>> is related to shipping.
>
> Doh, of course. Maybe I'd better go to bed now...
>
> regards, tom lane

You actually sleep?

--
Until later, Geoffrey

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
- Benjamin Franklin

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoffrey 2007-04-06 12:46:11 Re: SCSI vs SATA
Previous Message Ron 2007-04-06 12:31:51 Re: SCSI vs SATA