Tom Lane írta:
> Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> writes:
>> The idea wouldn't have considered to cross my mind
>> if Tom didn't mention the action-at-a-distance behaviour.
> AFAIR, that remark had to do with NEXT VALUE FOR, which SQL2003 defines
> in a very weird way (it's not equivalent to nextval() as one would wish).
> I don't see anything strange in the spec for GENERATED.
> regards, tom lane
Thanks for clarifying.
Please review the version I sent you.
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2007-04-04 15:21:41|
|Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-04-04 15:11:20|
|Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code? |
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-04-04 15:39:56|
|Subject: Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-04-04 15:07:51|
|Subject: Re: Auto Partitioning|