Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> As a proposed fix, instead of acquiring the CheckpointStartLock in
>> RecordTransactionCommit, we set a flag in MyProc saying "commit in
>> progress". Checkpoint will scan through the procarray and make note of
>> any commit in progress transactions, after computing the new redo record
>> ptr, and wait for all of them to finish before flushing clog.
> What sort of "wait for finish" mechanism do you have in mind? While
> I've always thought CheckpointStartLock is a pretty ugly solution,
> I'm not sure the above is better.
I was thinking of XactLockTableWait.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2007-04-02 20:59:08|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Use non-deprecated APIs for
|Previous:||From: Mark Dilger||Date: 2007-04-02 20:50:36|
|Subject: Re: Bug in UTF8-Validation Code?|