Luke Lonergan wrote:
> This is big news - has anyone checked to see if the agreement for the OIN is
> in perpetuity? Or is their agreement to not pursue patents only for as long
> as they are members?
I'm sure they would be estopped from enforcing a patent against someone
who relied on the assurance while they were a member, so I doubt this
distinction matters. Otherwise it becomes worthless.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-03-31 17:33:15|
|Subject: Re: CIC and deadlocks |
|Previous:||From: Luke Lonergan||Date: 2007-03-31 17:06:26|
|Subject: Re: Oracle indemnifies PostgreSQL on its patents|