Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout
Date: 2007-03-31 15:46:03
Message-ID: 460E823B.9070303@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Russell Smith wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I ran into an interesting problem with a customer today. They are
>> running Jabber XCP (not the one we use). Unfortunately, the product
>> has a bug that causes it to leave connections persistent in a
>> transaction state. This is what it does:
>>
>> BEGIN; SELECT 1;
>>
>> Basically it is verifying that the connection is live. However, it
>> never calls commit. So what happens? We can't vacuum ;).
>>
>> Anyway, my thought is, we know when a transaction is idle, why not
>> have an idle timeout where we will explicitly close the connection or
>> rollback or something? User configurable of course.
> I agree with this, it reduces the long running transaction problem a
> little where the user forgot to commit/rollback their session. I may be
> worth having a transaction_timeout as well, and setting it to link a few
> hours by default. That way you can't have really long running
> transactions unless you specifically set that.

We would certainly need to be able to disable on the fly too just with
SET as well.

Joshua D. Drake

>>
>> Sincerely,
>>
>> Joshua D. Drake
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-31 15:46:06 Re: Last minute mini-proposal (I know, I know) forPQexecf()
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-31 15:38:30 Re: CIC and deadlocks