Re: Patch queue concern

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch queue concern
Date: 2007-03-29 17:31:45
Message-ID: 460BF801.4000309@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> We don't want open-ended a few days before feature feeze. We want them
> to be as done, at some complete stopping point, and submitted.
>
>>> OK, but we don't want something that is ready to be committed, we need
>>> it complete.
>> So how many more releases before you think Postgres is "complete"?
>
> I am getting tired of your semantic games, here, Greg. I have no idea
> what you are trying to accomplish, but I have better things to do.

I have to concur here. Everyone is doing the best that they can. Greg,
how about reviewing some patches?

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavan Deolasee 2007-03-29 17:34:20 Re: CREATE INDEX and HOT - revised design
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-29 17:30:54 Re: Fixing insecure security definer functions