Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 17:11 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>> I would love, love, love to be able to use this syntax within pg_dump as
>>> well, so we can create multiple indexes in parallel at restore time.
>>> Anyone fancy adding that as well? We should be able to speed up overall
>>> index builds by x2 using concurrent builds.
>> You will need to teach pg_restore any trick you use here - it doesn't
>> use psql.
> The proposed change is to psql and making it work with pg_restore would
> take a lot more thought, so probably not an 8.3 item. Should we make it
> to neither because we can't make it to both?
I'm all for the change to psql, but personally I think it's late in the
day to be specifying a change to pg_dump.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2007-03-27 22:47:19|
|Subject: Re: Proposal: Adding JIS X 0213 support|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2007-03-27 21:13:47|
|Subject: Re: Concurrent connections in psql|