Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: linux - server configuration for small database

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Paolo Negri <hungrylist(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: linux - server configuration for small database
Date: 2007-03-23 15:51:25
Message-ID: 4603F77D.1050705@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Paolo Negri" <hungrylist(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> The first question I have is, since I'd strongly prefer to use
>> postgresql 8.1 or 8.2 instead of the 7.4 that comes with redhat, if
>> someone else is using with success third party rpms with success in
>> business critical applications.
> 
> Red Hat does support postgres 8.1 on RHEL4:
> http://www.redhat.com/appstack/

And so does the community:

http://ftp9.us.postgresql.org/pub/mirrors/postgresql/binary/v8.1.8/linux/rpms/redhat/
http://ftp9.us.postgresql.org/pub/mirrors/postgresql/binary/v8.2.3/linux/rpms/redhat/


Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/


In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2007-03-23 16:32:35
Subject: Re: Vacuum full is slow
Previous:From: DimitriDate: 2007-03-23 15:37:32
Subject: Re: Parallel Vacuum

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group