Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans
Date: 2007-03-02 21:44:30
Message-ID: 45E89ABE.8070008@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:52:14AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Unfortunately we (the community) will not have WITH/RECURSIVE for 8.3.
>> However I have spoken with a Alexey and Alvaro and Command Prompt has
>> decided to make WITH/RECURSIVE a priority for 8.4.
>
> Any chance we can get WITH without RECURSIVE? That would be very
> handy all by itself.

I spoke with Alvaro and he politely but firmly reminded me that we have
an autovac committment to the 8.3 tree that we would prefer to keep.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Cheers,
> D

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-02 21:45:30 Re: Custom session variables?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-02 21:39:38 Re: How often do I need to reindex tables?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-02 22:05:41 Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?
Previous Message Darcy Buskermolen 2007-03-02 21:41:18 Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2