David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:52:14AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Unfortunately we (the community) will not have WITH/RECURSIVE for 8.3. 
>> However I have spoken with a Alexey and Alvaro and Command Prompt has 
>> decided to make WITH/RECURSIVE a priority for 8.4.
> 
> Any chance we can get WITH without RECURSIVE?  That would be very
> handy all by itself.

I spoke with Alvaro and he politely but firmly reminded me that we have
an autovac committment to the 8.3 tree that we would prefer to keep.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> Cheers,
> D


-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
             http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans at 2007-03-02 19:09:22 from David Fetter

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2007-03-02 22:05:41
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?
Previous:	From: Darcy Buskermolen	Date: 2007-03-02 21:41:18
	Subject: Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2

pgsql-general by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-03-02 21:45:30
	Subject: Re: Custom session variables?
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-03-02 21:39:38
	Subject: Re: How often do I need to reindex tables?