Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Date: 2007-03-02 21:44:30
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:52:14AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Hello,
>> Unfortunately we (the community) will not have WITH/RECURSIVE for 8.3. 
>> However I have spoken with a Alexey and Alvaro and Command Prompt has 
>> decided to make WITH/RECURSIVE a priority for 8.4.
> Any chance we can get WITH without RECURSIVE?  That would be very
> handy all by itself.

I spoke with Alvaro and he politely but firmly reminded me that we have
an autovac committment to the 8.3 tree that we would prefer to keep.


Joshua D. Drake

> Cheers,
> D


      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive  PostgreSQL solutions since 1997

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project:
PostgreSQL Replication:

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-03-02 22:05:41
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Deadlock with pg_dump?
Previous:From: Darcy BuskermolenDate: 2007-03-02 21:41:18
Subject: Re: Possible Bug: high CPU usage for stats collector in 8.2

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-03-02 21:45:30
Subject: Re: Custom session variables?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-03-02 21:39:38
Subject: Re: How often do I need to reindex tables?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group