Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WITH/RECURSIVE plans
Date: 2007-03-02 20:00:58
Message-ID: 45E8827A.5020802@commandprompt.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:52:14AM -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Unfortunately we (the community) will not have WITH/RECURSIVE for 8.3. 
>> However I have spoken with a Alexey and Alvaro and Command Prompt has 
>> decided to make WITH/RECURSIVE a priority for 8.4.
> 
> Any chance we can get WITH without RECURSIVE?  That would be very
> handy all by itself.

I don't think that we are comfortable committing to that. I will talk 
with Alvaro and see what he thinks.

Joshua D. Drake


> 
> Cheers,
> D


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Oleg BartunovDate: 2007-03-02 20:08:08
Subject: Re: Google SoC: lots of discussion, very few mentors
Previous:From: Zoltan BoszormenyiDate: 2007-03-02 19:55:25
Subject: Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Casey DuncanDate: 2007-03-02 20:15:53
Subject: Large aggregate query running out of memory in ExecutorState
Previous:From: Adam RichDate: 2007-03-02 19:53:28
Subject: Custom session variables?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group