Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Zdenek Kotala wrote:
>> There is Solaris FAQ update. Please, look on it and let me know any
> The actual answer to the question "Can I compile PostgreSQL with
> Kerberos v5 support?" is "Yes, why not?". I don't think "Can I use
> this weird internal private library that seems to provide a similar
> interface?" is a "Frequently Asked Question".
You have right that it is not frequent question, but my colleagues have
bad experience with people who did it with samba server and it is only
warning "don't do that" for people who want to try it.
If you guess that it is not important, do not hesitate to remove it.
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2007-02-27 13:28:48|
|Subject: Re: BUG #3059: psql to 'postgres' shortcut|
|Previous:||From: ferdinand.wess||Date: 2007-02-27 11:32:57|
|Subject: BUG #3083: Installation to path with umlaufs fails with initdb|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2007-02-27 13:34:26|
|Subject: Re: HOT WIP Patch - version 3.2|
|Previous:||From: ITAGAKI Takahiro||Date: 2007-02-27 11:51:36|
|Subject: Re: patch for ECPG (BUG #2956: ECPG does not treat multibyte characters correctly.)|