Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: dump sizes changed...

From: Lewis Kapell <lkapell(at)setonhome(dot)org>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: dump sizes changed...
Date: 2007-02-12 17:42:49
Message-ID: 45D0A719.9030705@setonhome.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
Sorry, I should have given the versions.  The old server was running 
8.0.8, the new server is running 8.2.1.

Thank you,

Lewis Kapell
Computer Operations
Seton Home Study School


Tom Lane wrote:
> Lewis Kapell <lkapell(at)setonhome(dot)org> writes:
>> We recently migrated to a new server after having had the old one 
>> running continously for over a year.  The first night that we did a 
>> backup, the file produced by pg_dumpall was noticably smaller than the 
>> one we got from the old server prior to the switchover (2.5 GB versus 
>> 3.1 GB).
> 
>> Is this something we should be alarmed about,
> 
> It requires investigation at least.  Are these the same PG version, or
> different ones?
> 
> We modified pg_dump awhile ago to be less verbose, but I think it was
> only shortening the "comments" a bit; your result sounds too different
> to be explained by that.
> 
> 			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Ezequias Rodrigues da RochaDate: 2007-02-12 17:43:14
Subject: Deadlock on transaction
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-02-12 17:34:40
Subject: Re: dump sizes changed...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group