Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, this is a perfect example of why it's not a good idea to allow
> minor regression failures to go unfixed --- people become desensitized.
> I know I've been completely ignoring ECPG-Check buildfarm results
> for awhile now.
I already reported that a while ago:
there was also some discussion off-list last week with Michael - I have
arranged for an account on that box for him but I'm not sure if he
already found time to investigate.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-02-01 17:31:47|
|Subject: Re: A more general approach (Re: Data archiving/warehousing idea) |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-02-01 17:17:21|
|Subject: Why is ecpg segfaulting on buildfarm member "clownfish"?|