Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> So what are we thinking here? Along with my suggestion of extensions /
>> contrib that we modify initdb to load an extensions schema with all
>> extensions into template1?
> No, I don't think so. If you do that it's effectively moving all that
> stuff into core, especially if you haven't provided a way to turn it off.
O.k. any thoughts there? What if we didn't make the extensions schema
PUBLIC? Meaning that explicits rights would have to be given for the
extensions to be used by anyone but a super user?
Obviously the initdb switch could also be selective:
Joshua D. Drake
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2007-01-28 07:19:17|
|Subject: Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2007-01-28 05:29:35|
|Subject: Re: Modifying and solidifying contrib |