Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Gevik Babakhani wrote:
>> So.. do we agree for uuid to be included in the core?
> I suggest that you read the discussion in the tsearch thread about
> figuring out how to make contrib modules more attractive. I don't see
> a reason why uuid has to be in the core, but I do see that there needs
> to be some centrally organized consolidation of the various existing
> attempts under a label of officiality.
I think it would be more important to determine how we can get UUID in
core. It is a known and accepted way of doing things in the marketplace
and professional communities.
It is time we stop fighting features for the sake of fighting features.
Joshua D. Drake
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Oleg Bartunov||Date: 2007-01-25 17:51:14|
|Subject: Re: tsearch in core patch, for inclusion|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2007-01-25 17:13:54|
|Subject: Re: guid/uuid datatype|