Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
>
>   
>> Bill Moran wrote:
>>     
>>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Bill Moran wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> + 		if (trace_temp_files != -1)
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> Might be more robust to say
>>>>
>>>>     if (trace_temp_files >= 0)
>>>>         
>>> Because it would allow for the easy addition of more negative numbers
>>> with magic value?
>>>       
>> because ISTM any negative number here should mean no action is to be
>> taken. Otherwise how else is it different from 0?
>>     
>
> ??
>
> I specified in the GUC config that minimum allowable value is -1.
>
>   


OK, missed that, sorry. Please return to normal viewing ...

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files at 2007-01-04 14:18:12 from Bill Moran

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-01-04 14:43:18
	Subject: Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-01-04 14:27:56
	Subject: wal_checksum = on (default) | off

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2007-01-04 14:56:18
	Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2007-01-04 14:27:56
	Subject: wal_checksum = on (default) | off