Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.3 pending patch queue

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.3 pending patch queue
Date: 2007-01-04 14:09:18
Message-ID: (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'm not clear about the difference between the unapplied patches list
> and the hold list. What is the significance of the two lists?

AIUI, the hold list is those patches providing new features that were 
held over between 8.2 feature freeze and 8.2 branch. Since they have 
been around for a while I think they have some claim to priority. The 
other list is just the normal running list of such patches that Bruce keeps.

> There's a number of patches submitted to pgsql-patches that don't show
> up on either list. 

That also happens. The only way I can see of ensuring it does not happen 
would be to auto-process all patch submissions.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bill MoranDate: 2007-01-04 14:18:12
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2007-01-04 12:40:54
Subject: Tabs or Spaces

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group