I notice that quite a few pg_ctl options have no long form equivalents, 
namely these: NopPwW

Also, none of the long forms seems to be documented at all.

Should this be cleared up (maybe a nice first project for lurking new 
contributors)?\

If we don't want long forms for some reason, then a comment in the code 
saying why would make sense.

cheers

andrew

Responses

• Re: pg_ctl options at 2007-01-04 02:07:44 from Euler Taveira de Oliveira
• Re: pg_ctl options at 2007-01-06 22:18:33 from Bruce Momjian

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Florian Weimer	Date: 2007-01-03 14:12:21
	Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Previous:	From: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD	Date: 2007-01-03 11:56:11
	Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units