pg_ctl options

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pg_ctl options
Date: 2007-01-03 14:12:10
Message-ID: 459BB9BA.1010502@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I notice that quite a few pg_ctl options have no long form equivalents,
namely these: NopPwW

Also, none of the long forms seems to be documented at all.

Should this be cleared up (maybe a nice first project for lurking new
contributors)?\

If we don't want long forms for some reason, then a comment in the code
saying why would make sense.

cheers

andrew

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Florian Weimer 2007-01-03 14:12:21 Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD 2007-01-03 11:56:11 Re: effective_cache_size vs units