Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

pg_ctl options

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: pg_ctl options
Date: 2007-01-03 14:12:10
Message-ID: 459BB9BA.1010502@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I notice that quite a few pg_ctl options have no long form equivalents, 
namely these: NopPwW

Also, none of the long forms seems to be documented at all.

Should this be cleared up (maybe a nice first project for lurking new 
contributors)?\

If we don't want long forms for some reason, then a comment in the code 
saying why would make sense.

cheers

andrew

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Florian WeimerDate: 2007-01-03 14:12:21
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Previous:From: Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SDDate: 2007-01-03 11:56:11
Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group