Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>   
>> ... And then we'd need to change the regression makefile to use 
>> the option, based on an environment variable a bit like MAX_CONNEXCTIONS 
>> maybe.
>>     
>
> Why wouldn't we just use it always?  If a regression test dumps core,
> that's going to deserve investigation.
>
> 	
>   

Revised patch attached, doing just this. I will apply it soon unless 
there are objections.

cheers

andrew

In response to

• Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD at 2006-12-29 21:44:39 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD at 2007-01-02 21:11:37 from Tom Lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2007-01-02 20:59:34
	Subject: Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Previous:	From: David Boreham	Date: 2007-01-02 20:52:45
	Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS

pgsql-patches by date

Next:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2007-01-02 20:59:34
	Subject: Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Previous:	From: Bruce Momjian	Date: 2007-01-02 20:23:57
	Subject: Re: xlog directory at initdb time