Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD
Date: 2007-01-02 20:54:59
Message-ID: 459AC6A3.2000202@dunslane.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>   
>> ... And then we'd need to change the regression makefile to use 
>> the option, based on an environment variable a bit like MAX_CONNEXCTIONS 
>> maybe.
>>     
>
> Why wouldn't we just use it always?  If a regression test dumps core,
> that's going to deserve investigation.
>
> 	
>   

Revised patch attached, doing just this. I will apply it soon unless 
there are objections.

cheers

andrew


Attachment: corepatch
Description: text/plain (6.2 KB)

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-02 20:59:34
Subject: Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Previous:From: David BorehamDate: 2007-01-02 20:52:45
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-02 20:59:34
Subject: Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-01-02 20:23:57
Subject: Re: xlog directory at initdb time

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group