Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: charpent(at)bacbuc(dot)fdn(dot)fr, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Beta2 ... ?
Date: 2001-01-07 18:18:02
Message-ID: 4599.978891482@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Oliver Elphick" <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I'll be doing it soon; but I don't want to release debs until there is
> no more chance of an initdb's being needed between betas; that bit me on 
> 7.0.

In that case you may as well say that there will be no beta debs, and
Debian users can forget about being part of the beta test process.

We do not make a guarantee of "no more initdbs" until final release.
The severity of bug needed to make us do one goes up considerably with
each beta, but there will not be a guarantee on *any* beta.  If there
were such a guarantee, it'd be final not beta.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: The Hermit HackerDate: 2001-01-07 18:18:46
Subject: Re: Suggested fix for pg_dump
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-01-07 18:08:56
Subject: Re: Quite strange crash

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group