Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD
Date: 2006-12-29 23:08:56
Message-ID: 4595A008.4000204@kaltenbrunner.cc
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> ... And then we'd need to change the regression makefile to use
>> the option, based on an environment variable a bit like MAX_CONNEXCTIONS
>> maybe.
>
> Why wouldn't we just use it always? If a regression test dumps core,
> that's going to deserve investigation.

enabling it always for the regression tests probably makes sense - but
there is also the possibility that such a core can get very large and
potentially run the partitition the regression test runs on out of space.

Stefan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-29 23:21:50 Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Previous Message Robert Treat 2006-12-29 22:57:12 Re: TODO: GNU TLS

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-12-30 02:02:11 Re: Load distributed checkpoint
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-12-29 21:44:39 Re: [HACKERS] Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD