Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD

From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recent SIGSEGV failures in buildfarm HEAD
Date: 2006-12-29 17:32:44
Message-ID: 4595513C.9010704@kaltenbrunner.cc (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I'm actually wondering if unlimiting core might not be a useful switch 
>> to provide on pg_ctl, as long as the platform has setrlimit().
> 
> Not a bad thought; that's actually one of the reasons that I still
> usually use a handmade script rather than pg_ctl for launching
> postmasters ...

this sounds like a good idea for me too - it seems like a cleaner and
more useful thing on a general base then just doing it in the buildfarm
code ...


Stefan

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2006-12-29 18:24:16
Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS
Previous:From: Chris BrowneDate: 2006-12-29 17:30:28
Subject: Re: Deadline-Based Vacuum Delay

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2006-12-29 17:43:09
Subject: Re: Fwd: I would like to alter the COPY command
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-12-29 17:27:38
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group