Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS

From: Arnau <arnaulist(at)andromeiberica(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL Performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS
Date: 2006-12-29 14:26:15
Message-ID: 45952587.5060603@andromeiberica.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Hi all,

> A= go through each query and see what work_mem needs to be for that 
> query to be as RAM resident as possible.  If you have enough RAM, set 
> work_mem for that query that large.  Remember that work_mem is =per 
> query=, so queries running in parallel eat the sum of each of their 
> work_mem's.

How can I know what work_mem needs a query needs?

Regards
-- 
Arnau

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Rod TaylorDate: 2006-12-29 17:28:49
Subject: Re: Backup/Restore too slow
Previous:From: RonDate: 2006-12-29 12:52:59
Subject: Re: High update activity, PostgreSQL vs BigDBMS

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group