| From: | Benjamin Arai <benjamin(at)araisoft(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think) |
| Date: | 2006-12-23 19:41:48 |
| Message-ID: | 458D867C.5000207@araisoft.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-general |
Function Scan on "getTimeSeries" (cost=0.00..12.50 rows=1000 width=24)
(actual time=11065.981..11067.008 rows=262 loops=1)
Total runtime: 11067.991 ms
(2 rows)
It is a PL function. Do I need to break it down?
A. Kretschmer wrote:
> am Sat, dem 23.12.2006, um 11:26:08 -0800 mailte Benjamin Arai folgendes:
>
>> because it would literally take over a week to complete. Any help would
>> be greatly appreciated.
>>
>
> What says an 'explain analyse'?
>
>
> Andreas
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Benjamin Arai | 2006-12-23 19:48:56 | Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think) |
| Previous Message | Jeff Frost | 2006-12-23 19:39:56 | Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Benjamin Arai | 2006-12-23 19:48:56 | Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think) |
| Previous Message | Jeff Frost | 2006-12-23 19:39:56 | Re: Problem with large table not using indexes (I think) |