Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 09:47 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
>> On the other hand, this would be the only part of the system where
>> the official interface/API is a system catalog table. Do we really
>> want to expose the internal representation of something as our API?
>> That doesn't seem wise to me...
> Define and agree the API (the hard bit) and I'll code it (the easy bit).
> We may as well have something on the table, even if it changes later.
> Dave: How does PgAdmin handle setting table-specific autovacuum
> parameters? (Does it?)
Yes, it adds/removes/edits rows in pg_autovacuum as required.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2006-12-21 16:05:16|
|Subject: pgsql: Initial SQL/XML support: xml data type and initial set of |
|Previous:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2006-12-21 15:52:46|
|Subject: Re: ERROR: tuple concurrently updated|